Summary
This module introduces buffer overflow attacks, principles such as CPU architecture and CPU registers, and walks through the basics of exploit development and shellcode generation. We will also walk through a public exploit proof of concept and cover techniques for preventing these types of attacks.
In this module, we will cover:
- An introduction to buffer overflows
- The basics of exploit development
- Dealing with shellcode length and bad characters
- Public exploit modification
- Buffer overflow prevention
CREST CPSA/CRT
-related Sections:
- All sections
CREST CCT INF
-related Sections:
- All sections
This module is broken down into sections with accompanying hands-on exercises to practice each of the tactics and techniques we cover. The module ends with a practical hands-on skills assessment to gauge your understanding of the various topic areas.
As you work through the module, you will see example commands and command output for the various topics introduced. It is worth reproducing as many of these examples as possible to reinforce further the concepts introduced in each section. You can do this in the Pwnbox provided in the interactive sections or your own virtual machine.
You can start and stop the module at any time and pick up where you left off. There is no time limit or "grading," but you must complete all of the exercises and the skills assessment to receive the maximum number of cubes and have this module marked as complete in any paths you have chosen.
The module is classified as "Medium" but assumes a working knowledge of the Linux command line and an understanding of information security fundamentals.
A firm grasp of the following modules can be considered prerequisites for successful completion of this module:
- Introduction to Networking
- Linux Fundamentals
Buffer Overflows Overview
Buffer overflows have become less common in todays world as modern compilers have built in memory-protections that make it difficult for memory corruption bugs to occur accidentally. That being said languages like C are not going to go away anytime soon and they are predominate in embedded software and IOT (Internet of Things). One of my favorite somewhat recent Buffer Overflows was CVE-2021-3156, which was a Heap-Based Buffer Overflow in sudo.
These attacks aren't limited to binaries, a large number of buffer overflows occur in web applications, especially embedded devices which utilize custom webservers. A good example is CVE-2017-12542 with HP iLO (Integrated Lights Out) Management devices. Just sending 29 characters in an HTTP Header parameter caused a buffer overflow which bypassed login. I like this example because there is no need for an actual payload that you'll read more about later since the system "failed open" upon reaching an error.
In short, buffer overflows are caused by incorrect program code, which cannot process too large amounts of data correctly by the CPU and can, therefore, manipulate the CPU's processing. Suppose too much data is written to a reserved memory buffer
or stack
that is not limited, for example. In that case, specific registers will be overwritten, which may allow code to be executed.
A buffer overflow can cause the program to crash, corrupt data, or harm data structures in the program's runtime. The last of these can overwrite the specific program's return address
with arbitrary data, allowing an attacker to execute commands with the privileges of the process
vulnerable to the buffer overflow by passing arbitrary machine code. This code is usually intended to give us more convenient access to the system to use it for our own purposes. Such buffer overflows in common servers, and Internet worms also exploit client software.
A particularly popular target on Unix systems is root access, which gives us all permissions to access the system. However, as is often misunderstood, this does not mean that a buffer overflow that "only" leads to the privileges of a standard user is harmless. Getting the coveted root access is often much easier if you already have user privileges.
Buffer overflows, in addition to programming carelessness, are mainly made possible by computer systems based on the Von-Neumann architecture.
The most significant cause of buffer overflows is the use of programming languages that do not automatically monitor limits of memory buffer or stack to prevent (stack-based) buffer overflow. These include the C
and C++
languages, which emphasize performance and do not require monitoring.
For this reason, developers are forced to define such areas in the programming code themselves, which increases vulnerability many times over. These areas are often left undefined for testing purposes or due to carelessness. Even if they were used for testing purposes, they might have been overlooked at the end of the development process.
However, not every application environment will likely exhibit a buffer overflow condition. For example, a stand-alone Java application is least likely compared to others because of how Java handles memory management. Java uses a "garbage collection" technique to manage memory, which helps prevent buffer overflow conditions.